| FAO Women Only | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Potti
Number of posts : 57 Localisation : Always sunny Dorset Registration date : 2009-04-30
| Subject: FAO Women Only Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:11 pm | |
| [b] Well don't blame me if you are a nosy bloke who feels left out cos it says women only... u have been warned! There is nothing worse than brambles up ya arse whilst squatting for a pee and I really think men have the best deal as they can do all sorts whilst weeing, whereas we have a discreet and fine balancing act to carry out. But in the interests of equality I have secured some support from SheeWee and will be getting one for each of the gals on the trip. So we can also now stand and pee up the side of the vehicles when caught short in the mountains! They are great little devices and easy peesie to use ... you can check em out here....... http://www.shewee.com | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:15 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:09 pm | |
| Hope your realise 4x4Bun and Truffles that you'll be missing out on your Brucie Bonus? Your SheWee. I just know Emms would be up for it, but I bet you're gutted Carrie ... NOT! | |
|
| |
JC
Number of posts : 138 Age : 63 Localisation : Dorset Registration date : 2009-04-22
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:01 am | |
| - Potti wrote:
- [b]Well don't blame me if you are a nosy bloke who feels left out cos it says women only... u have been warned!
Just to let you know I haven't read this post and so shan't be putting up a response. | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:50 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
4x4Bun
Number of posts : 40 Age : 47 Localisation : Hampshire Registration date : 2007-08-07
| |
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:39 pm | |
| That'll teach you to drink pints! Wouldn't have happened in the 'good old days' when the female of the species would drink Babycham with a cocked little finger whilst looking pretty for their man. | |
|
| |
Potti
Number of posts : 57 Localisation : Always sunny Dorset Registration date : 2009-04-30
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:26 am | |
| - 4x4Bun wrote:
- You have to pee REALLY slowly so the resevoir doesn't overflow all over your trousers....not good if you've been holding a while.....
hahahaha.... sheewee was a big hit on our Ben Nevis trip this weekend. No wet trousers at all. Fab device and the subject of much banter at The Ben Nevis Inn over a wee (no pun intended) dram | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:34 pm | |
| Obviously a real lady (take note Bun) who drinks lady drinks, thus the lack of overflow! I can't believe I'm actually talking overflowing SheWees!!! Very wrong | |
|
| |
DirtyWeekenders
Number of posts : 84 Localisation : Essex and Hampshire Registration date : 2009-07-14
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:59 pm | |
| Dont read this unless you are prepared for a laugh at Rhoda's expense Well I'd be interested to know how people got on with them. Didn't actually use mine on the rally. I decided that I should give it a go at home. After practising a few times without underwear, I thought I'd try it as if I was out in the woods or something (i.e. standing in front of the loo, with my clothes on). So I "carefully moved the underwear to one side", as the instructions say, and began to pee. I soon realised I need more practice, as I might as well have been peeing without the shewee (which I suppose I effectively was) with the amount of liquid which made its way down to my socks!! The neighbours now think I am a little bit mad because of the hysterical laughter coming from my bathroom! I think I might have to put up with the stinging nettles for a while. Mind you, it wasn't as messy or funny as when someone left the lid of the ladies portaloo down one night at one of our Easter events, and I didn't know cos I didn't have a torch. | |
|
| |
Sylvia Johnson
Number of posts : 783 Registration date : 2008-03-27
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:04 am | |
| It could only happen to you Rhoda.
I've never tried one of these devices though to be fair ! | |
|
| |
Smego
Number of posts : 68 Registration date : 2007-02-17
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:18 am | |
| I have heard from a female friend that shewee works better if you have "cut the grass" around the cave.
better seal I hear... | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:51 am | |
| How about Copydex for a good seal? I'd suggest No Nails but I would reckon a SheWee as a permanent feature would ruin the cut of a dress. | |
|
| |
DirtyWeekenders
Number of posts : 84 Localisation : Essex and Hampshire Registration date : 2009-07-14
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:05 pm | |
| All very well until you want to remove it - ouch! Anyway next year, perhaps Jo could get a sponsor to supply these: http://www.roadbag.de/ladybag-en/ I'm giving up trying now, can't cope with the washing!! | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:24 pm | |
| Ladybag? Surely cheaper (if a little heavy) to lug around a plastic carrier-bag full of sand around with you! | |
|
| |
Sylvia Johnson
Number of posts : 783 Registration date : 2008-03-27
| |
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:24 pm | |
| I'm more likely to buy my head in it. And before you ask, yes, before use! | |
|
| |
DirtyWeekenders
Number of posts : 84 Localisation : Essex and Hampshire Registration date : 2009-07-14
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:38 pm | |
| So, perhaps the Landyprikkers should carry all the sand. That way (1) We'd be sure the sand would always be available, because they never break down OR (2) The long sought after handicap would be found, as they wouldn't be able to cope with all the extra weight!! Job done (so to speak) | |
|
| |
Tom Mc Organiser
Number of posts : 3925 Registration date : 2007-01-29
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:09 pm | |
| Trouble is they would win extra points for the 'best sand castle'! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: FAO Women Only | |
| |
|
| |
| FAO Women Only | |
|